Vitalik Buterin: Ethereum Foundation Should Shrink

Vitalik Buterin argues for a smaller, more focused Ethereum Foundation to reduce ETH sales and prioritize long-term protocol integrity.

The Future of Ethereum: Buterin Proposes a Leaner Foundation

In a major strategic shift, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for the Ethereum Foundation (EF) to downsize. He argues that the organization should become smaller and more opinionated, shifting its focus away from asset promotion and business development toward core technical research.

The proposal comes amid a wave of departures, with at least nine senior members leaving the EF in 2026, and persistent community friction regarding treasury ETH sales.

«The EF should be one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes, prioritizing longevity over breadth,» Buterin stated in his recent post.

Fiscal Reality and the ‘Sell Less’ Mandate

The EF holds roughly 0.16% of total ETH supply, a fraction compared to other major blockchain foundations.

While the foundation has moved toward yield generation via staking, generating $3.9 million to $5.4 million annually, this remains a drop in the bucket compared to historical operating costs of nearly $100 million. To stop selling ETH, the foundation must fundamentally shrink its footprint.

Key Strategic Trade-offs

  • Decentralization vs. Urgency: While Buterin views this as decentralization in practice, critics fear it signals execution weakness compared to competitors like Solana.
  • Institutional Credibility: By focusing on censorship resistance and formal verification, the EF aims to provide a base layer that institutions can trust.
  • External Coordination: The success of this model depends on outside organizations absorbing the business development functions the EF is vacating.

FAQ

Why does Buterin want to shrink the Ethereum Foundation?

He believes a smaller, more ideological EF creates more durable value for the ecosystem by resisting financial capture and reducing reliance on treasury ETH sales.

Is this a sign of weakness for Ethereum?

It is a point of contention. While Buterin views it as necessary decentralization, some holders worry that a smaller EF will struggle to compete with growth-oriented institutions in the current market.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *